Thursday, June 28, 2007

The Right to an Attorney

[n.b.: about the "Six Minute Increment Project"]


State entered commit a

in a to the

Court but represent the Florida can
Defendant charged am to Counsel case

Supreme to

to conducted as layman to witnesses
defense made innocence the the guilty
serve prison Florida petition on court's
him the Rights treating as Supreme
without since decided

problem right court of state this
granted in to sides and this
be

Betts unconstitutionally counsel strikingly Gideon claim
in arraignment of hire court Betts
not to except he witnesses examined
to guilty a years

Sought that right violation was review
held counsel with violate the given
the the

due by of that constitute shocking
justice in fall

due rigid envisaged provisions the appoint
and was common as of and
are the standing Gideon's him full
Brady

Amendment the to for this courts
defendants the waived is state in
while no the the upon rule
a due is by to guarantee
fundamental set on and colonies the
Rights in history present this that
a fair reason accept Amendment's federal
in made the Court for a
fair that of just in

the precedent of are from against
Process this and case where sweeping
Hurtado those justice of institutions specifically
of cases this fundamental Rights Fourteenth
the of made the it of
and for always the the that

taken compensation unreasonable Eighth's punishment Court
Fifth in speaking careful are government
pledges found concept through as guarantees
the prior the bill the of

assumption our of is fair the
we was the is rights this
all Betts right is Alabama close
by frequently the that fundamental counsel
in it nature in

certain first were by clause among
the counsel American

1938

of safeguards necessary of Amendment that
provides still the and

these of surprising faced charged to
counsel expressions court the as counsel
essential Court abrupt precedents precedents new
established of but us adversary person
too cannot unless this an and
sums to lawyers essential in are
few the to that and hire
strongest that necessities one may essential
countries form and laid substantive trials
every law realized with accusers him
lawyer in Justice

right in if right even has
in charged generally the he of
of on and evidence otherwise skill
his a guiding step without guilty
conviction how

Court the Court's Florida has left
of was and overruled

the Supreme action

Reversed.

Wednesday, June 27, 2007

Course of Dealing and Usage of Trade

[n.b.: about the "Six Minute Increment Project"]

A the which as understanding other

Is dealing in as it to
Existence usage facts such a writing
is.

Of usage or engaged or meaning
terms.

Terms applicable of reasonable but express
dealing course trade.

In of be as performance.

Of is he such sufficient the

The Six Minute Increment Project

The unearthed car may not run, but the gas has value. It's been quite some time since I regularly wrote poetry. The accumulated muck is thick and deep, and my poetic eye has atrophied like, ummm, a muscle you don't use for a long time. So I give you, or give me, the "Six Minute Increment Project." A chance operation style process to help get the motor humming.

As any good attorney knows, the entire basis of the legal-industrial complex is the the six-minute billable unit; every action throughout my day is accounted for in tenths of an hour. What better way to understand the law, then, than through the process of the Six Minute Increment Project, which employs multiples of the number six to generate poetry through legal texts.

Six Minute Increment Project Poems:

Tuesday, June 26, 2007

Certain Responsibilities

Certain Responsibilities
and Liabilities of Participants effecting transactions.

Pursuant to the rules,
you asked me to research

Certain diamonds were delivered by the plaintiff, their owner, to a dealer in diamonds, a receipt being taken which stated that they were received on approval, to show to customers, and were to be returned to plaintiff on demand. Held:

I can't resist.
I'd better get right down to the job.